Operant Conditioning Theory suggests that people learn behaviors primarily to:

Operant Conditioning Theory, developed by B.F. Skinner, posits that behaviors are learned or modified through the consequences that follow them. The central premise of this theory is that individuals tend to repeat behaviors that are followed by rewarding outcomes, while they may avoid behaviors that lead to negative or undesirable consequences. This concept is encapsulated in the ideas of reinforcement and punishment.

When people engage in certain behaviors and receive positive reinforcement—such as rewards, praise, or tangible benefits—they are more likely to repeat those behaviors in the future. Conversely, if a behavior results in punishment or an unfavorable outcome, people are likely to avoid that behavior to escape similar negative experiences. This fundamental understanding illustrates that the motivations behind behavior are closely linked to the consequences individuals perceive they will encounter.

The focus of Operant Conditioning is on the relationship between behavior and outcomes, making this response the most aligned with the core principles of the theory. In contrast, avoiding social interaction, following instructions from authority figures, or satisfying emotional needs are not primary drivers identified by Operant Conditioning. These aspects may play a role in human behavior, but they do not directly capture the essence of how behaviors are learned through consequences as proposed by Skinner. Hence, the emphasis on rewards and avoidance of negative